小型排泥水池结构选型分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

王树钧(1994—), 男, 硕士, 工程师, 从事市政结构设计工作。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU37

基金项目:

无


Analysis on Structural Type Selection for Small Sludge Discharge Tanks
Author:
Affiliation:

Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200092, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    小型排泥水池是水厂排泥水处理系统的关键构筑物,其结构选型直接影响着工程经济性与运营安全。当前设计多依赖经验,缺乏定量依据,且无明确工况最优体系指引。基于截条法,通过有限元软件 Robot 建立参数化模型(埋深 3~7 m、宽度 6~10 m),分析敞口、有盖两类水池内力规律,并对比有盖水池无梁板式、有梁板式、梁柱式顶板体系性能。研究结果表明:外土工况下,敞口水池埋深 5.0 m 为临界值,当埋深为5.0~7.0 m时,水池侧壁弯矩增幅达248.6%,因此该工况的适用埋深应不大于5.0 m;有盖水池受顶板约束,其侧壁弯矩显著低于敞口水池;有盖水池顶板弯矩对跨度敏感(跨度为6~10 m时的增幅达257%);在单跨不大于6 m 的小型有盖水池中,无梁板式体系造价较梁柱式降低 9.2%,综合优势最优。最终建立的水池埋深-宽度耦合结构选型适配表,可弥补规范在工况优选上的不足。

    Abstract:

    Small sludge discharge tanks are key structures in the sludge treatment system of waterworks, and their structural type selection directly affects the engineering economy and operational safety. At present, the design mostly relies on experience, lacking quantitative basis, and there is no clear optimal system guidance for working conditions. Based on the slice method, a parametric model (with a buried depth of 3~7 m and a width of 6~10 m) is established by using the finite element software Robot. The internal force laws of two types of tanks, namely open-top tank and covered tank, are analyzed, and the performances of three roof systems of flat slab type, slab-beam type and beam-column type of covered tanks are compared. The research results show that under the external soil condition, the critical buried depth of open-top tank is 5.0 m. When the buried depth ranges from 5.0 m to 7.0 m, the bending moment of the side wall of the tank increases by 248.6%, indicating that open-top tank is suitable for projects with a buried depth not larger than 5.0 m. The covered tank is constrained by the roof, and its side wall bending moment is significantly lower than that of the open-top tank. The roof bending moment of covered tank is sensitive to the span, with an increase of 256.9% when the span changes from 6 m to 10 m. For small-sized covered tank with a single span not larger than 6 m, the cost of the flat slab system is 9.2% lower than that of the beam-column system, demonstrating the optimal comprehensive advantages. Finally, a structural type selection adaptation table coupled with buried depth and width of the tank is established, which can make up for the deficiency of specifications in the optimization of working conditions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王树钧,徐海宁,刘勇.小型排泥水池结构选型分析[J].城市道桥与防洪,2026,(10):244-248.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-20
  • 最后修改日期:2026-01-19
  • 录用日期:2026-04-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-10-18
  • 出版日期:
关闭